Within the business world , there are events of professional negligence that go unnoticed , and then there are stories that challenge the very notion of accountability . The narrative of David Collins, a manager at Ventia formerly operating under the name Broadspectrum, exemplifies this type of scenario — a chronicle of dubious professional actions that deeply harms the reputation of a specific individual but throws doubt over the enterprise’s ethical framework .


Even amid the disturbing accusations, Collins has remained in his managerial role, apparently unaffected by the turmoil surrounding him. Why has this misconduct gone unchecked? What does this say about the company’s commitment to responsibility? According to the accounts of those familiar , Collins’ track record of misconduct started with violations of the firm’s ethics guidelines , but it escalated from there. Instead, it escalated into a series of ethical breaches that has left colleagues disillusioned and associates questioning the company’s ethics.


Amid a leadership training workshop — ostensibly designed to enhance managerial skills — David Collins allegedly morphed what should have been a development chance into a spree of inappropriate episodes . It’s reported he misused corporate resources for personal indiscretions , browse website , a clear breach of Ventia’s corporate guidelines, all while his home life was kept in the dark.


But the ethical breaches went further than just personal misconduct. One of the most troubling discoveries involves his alleged abuse of digital tools for personal gratification—a gross misappropriation of professional tools . His brazen use of Microsoft Teams to share flirtatious texts —including emojis flaunting extramarital affairs — paints a picture of a man unconcerned with the consequences . Following these online indiscretions , Collins allegedly escalated his transgressions : he is said to have had inappropriate relations Kerikeri David Collins with a subordinate during work hours , despite the personal and professional conflicts involved. This blatant exploitation of business resources violated every workplace standard but also tore apart homes— leaving a path of mistrust that extended far beyond the office .

How can this behavior be enabled to persist? Why is it that a manager who has allegedly overstepped every rule is still in a position of power at Ventia? The explanation, it appears, highlights a systemic failure in oversight. Complaints have been raised, but no disciplinary action has followed.

This deficiency of accountability conveys a risky precedent : that certain employees remain untouchable despite egregious violations. It breeds a damaging work setting , discourages ethical behavior , and ultimately undermines corporate credibility.